The Business

The client operates two full-service restaurants in New York City — a casual dining location in Brooklyn and a higher-volume concept in Manhattan's Midtown area. Combined, the two locations generate approximately $3.4M in annual revenue with a team of 28 employees across both sites.

Like many restaurant operators, the business had taken on short-term financing at multiple points over the prior two years — once during a slow winter season, once to fund a kitchen renovation, and a third time to cover a landlord dispute settlement that required a lump-sum payment. Each position came from a different funder, at different rates, with different payment schedules.

The Challenge

What Was Happening

  • Three separate daily and weekly sweeps totaling over $4,100 per week leaving the business accounts
  • Combined outstanding balance across all three positions: approximately $218,000
  • Two of the three positions were in their early weeks — the highest-cost portion of the repayment curve
  • The daily withdrawals were creating NSF-risk situations during slow revenue weeks
  • Staff scheduling decisions were being made around cash position rather than business need
  • The owner had stopped taking a salary draw for three consecutive months

The owner reached out to Mondra Capital not because he wanted new funding — he wanted relief from the existing obligations. He'd already spoken to one broker who told him consolidation wasn't possible while in default risk on one of the positions. That analysis was incomplete.

The Mondra Capital Approach

We requested all three funding agreements along with the most recent six months of bank statements for both locations. The picture that emerged was actually more positive than the owner believed: the combined business revenue was strong and growing. The cash flow problem was structural — too many obligations pulling simultaneously — not a revenue problem.

We ran a full analysis mapping every position: original advance amount, factor rate, amount paid to date, remaining balance, and daily/weekly payment. The total remaining across all three positions was $218,000. The payoff at a discount — which we negotiated with two of the three funders — brought the effective payoff to $195,000.

"I hadn't taken a paycheck in three months. These guys came in, understood the business in about 20 minutes, and within two weeks I had one payment instead of three and was back in control." — Owner, Restaurant Group, New York City

The key insight was that while one position appeared to be in early default risk, the business had never actually missed a payment — it had simply triggered an NSF on a Tuesday sweep that was debited before the weekend deposit cleared. We documented this for the consolidation lender and it was treated as a timing issue, not a default event.

Before & After

Before Consolidation

  • 3 separate funders sweeping accounts
  • Daily sweeps totaling ~$4,100/week
  • $218,000 total remaining balance
  • NSF risk on slow revenue weeks
  • Owner salary paused for 3 months
  • No visibility into true payoff path

After Consolidation

  • 1 lender, 1 weekly payment
  • Single weekly sweep of $2,700
  • $195,000 effective payoff (discounted)
  • Predictable payment — same day weekly
  • $6,200/month net cash flow improvement
  • Owner reinstated salary draw

The Result

The consolidation closed with a single lender at a total of $195,000 — structured as a weekly payment of $2,700 over the remaining term. Compared to the combined $4,100 in weekly obligations previously, the savings were immediate: $1,400 per week, or approximately $6,200 per month in freed-up cash flow.

Within 60 days of the consolidation closing, the owner had reinstated his salary draw and used the improved cash position to bring both locations to full staffing. Six months later, the Manhattan location hit its highest monthly revenue in 18 months of operation.

This case is a reminder that consolidation isn't just about reducing cost — it's about restoring clarity. When you go from three separate sweeps to one predictable weekly payment, the mental and operational load on the owner changes significantly.

← Back to All Case Studies